SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 MarsdenLR 1192

TUAN VINCENT, KIM KHOAY
TROPILAND SDN.BHD. – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellant - Balwant Singh Purba; M/s. BalwantSingh & Co.
For the respondent - Wong Teck Meng, DPP

JUDGMENT

Vincent Ng Kim Khoay JC:

This is an appeal from the decision in the Magistrate's Court, Georgetown, Pulau Pinang in respect of the following charge:

That you on 13 October 1987, did erect a building to wit:

(1) A drinks counter measuring approximately 6' x 15' O" within "Lift Lobby" area at the ground floor of Komtar Multi-Storey Car Park Complex, Penang.

(2) A counter measuring approximately 6' O" x 21' O" at the right side in front of the entrance to "Lift Lobby" area the ground floor of Komtar Multi-Storey Car Park Complex, Penang

without the prior written permission of the Majlis Perbandaran Pulau Pinang in contravention of s. 70 (1) of the Street, Drainage & Building Act 1974 and you have thereby committed an offence punishable under s. 70 (13) (c) of the said Act .

The appellant was convicted of the said charges and fined RM3,000 and the said two structures in question were ordered to be demolished within one year. The sole ground of appeal by the appellant is that the learned trial Magistrate ought to have held that the charge against the petitioner under s. 70 of the Street, Drainage & Building Act 1974 ("the Act") is bad in law and should have dismissed and a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top