SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 MarsdenLR 2736 ; 2005 MarsdenLR 1

BAHARUDIN SHAH MAHMUD
SILVER CONCEPT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
BRISDALE RASA DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Introduction

1. We heard both the above appeals together as they earlier seem to revolve around the same issues of law relating to frustration of contract and the same vendor Silver Concept Sdn. Bhd. being the common party. In the first appeal Civil Appeal No. W-02-555-2000 Brisdale Rasa Development Sdn. Bhd. (the First Appeal) is named as respondent whereas in the second appeal Civil Appeal No. W-02-178-2001 Maxisegar Sdn. Bhd. (the Second Appeal) is the appellant. Having heard arguments of counsel for the respective parties over several days we reserved our judgment.

2. My learned brother Abdul Kadir Sulaiman JCA who chaired the panel of this court had graciously given me his judgment in draft a few days before we sat to deliver our decision on 5.5.2005. Upon studying the said draft I had my misgivings on the reasoning and outcome of the First Appeal and was inclined to allow the respondent's cross-appeal. I indicated to my learned brother that I ' would be dissenting and would prepare my dissenting judgment in due course. As regards the Second Appeal, I expressed my concurrence with the finding and conclusion arrived at as well as the reasons therefor.

3. Unfortunately

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top