SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 MarsdenLR 4299

HAMID SULTAN
HIGH COURT (KOTA KINABALU)
Datuk Harris Mohd Salleh - Appellant
Versus
Datuk Mohd Shafie Hj Apdal - Respondents

SUIT NO K-23–05 OF 1998
Decided On : 09/05/2008

Colin Lau (Colin Lau & Co Advocates) for the plaintiff.
Sugumar Balakrishnan Esq (Sugumar & Co Advocates) for the second, third, fourth and fifth defendants.

Hamid Sultan JC::

[1] This is my judgment in respect of the plaintiff’s defamation suit against the second to fifth defendants. The action against the first defendant, a well known politician has been settled out of court. And the plaintiff claims against second and fifth defendants: (i) damages of up to RM25,000,000 for libel and slander; (ii) aggravated damages of up to RM10,000,000 for libel and slander; and (iii) exemplary damages of up to RM5,000,000 for libel and slander and against the third and fourth defendants: (i) damages of up to RM1,000,000 for libel and slander; (ii) aggravated damages of up to RM1,000,000 for libel and slander; and (iii) exemplary damages of up to RM1,000,000 for libel and slander.

[2] At the commencement of the hearing, parties have agreed that the case can be heard by way of: (i) witness statement for examination in chief; (ii) preliminary cross-examination witness statement, with full liberty to further cross-examine orally (for purposes of cross-examination); (iii) preliminary re-examination statement with full liberty to further re-examination if there is further oral examination. The court is extremely grateful to the parties for [*377] agreeing to such a mode as the preliminary cross-examination witness statement will save much of the court’s time to deal with peripheral matters and for all practical purposes, preliminary cross-examination witness statement will stand as interrogatories and answers thereto only, as the right of oral cross-examination to the litigant is preserved during the whole trial.

BRIEF FACTS (THE PLAINTIFF’S VERSION)

[3] The plaintiff is a well known politician and once the Chief Minister of Sabah. At the material time, the second defendant was the owner and/or publisher of Berita Harian, the third defendant, the editor, the fourth defendant, the reporter and/or writer of the said defamatory article and the fifth defendant, the printer (defendants). On 20 June 1998, some statements made by the first defendant which were defamatory of the plaintiff were published in the Berita Harian. Paragraph 7 of the statement of claim particularly says the statement was made by the first defendant on 19 June 1998, at the People Rakyat Session or conference or meeting. The statement was published as an article written by the fourth defendant. And the English translation of the article read as follows:

Investigate land owned by ex Chief Minister

By Muhd Yusuf Abu Bakar

Pulau Banggi (Kudat), Friday — The state government had been asked to

explanation to the residents of the state in relation to the transfer

of the ownership of the land here which belonged to the government’s

agency, Sabah Cattle Farm to the ex-Chief Minister Sabah, Datuk Harris

Salleh.

The Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Information, Datuk

Shafie Apdal said the government must investigate how did the ownership

of government agency land measuring approximately 2,500 hectares which

was allocated for dairy cattle farming had been transferred to an

individual.

‘The state government must give explanation to the residents of Pulau

Banggi and the state in connection with the transfer of the land

concerned to Harris who is now developing teak plantation in the area

concerned’ he said …

He said this to Berita Harian after the visit to Pulau Banggi. Also

present was the assistant district officer of Pulau Banggi, Nahalan

Medunah.

The Berjaya Government led by Harris through the subsidiary company of

Sabah Cattle Farm developed an area measuring of 2,500 hectares at

Pulau Banggi for dairy cattle farming in the 70’s, but it was not

successful.

The abandoned area has been taken by Harris for teak wood plantation.

This caused muttering among the residents concerning the status of the

ownership of the land concerned.

According to him, many agricultural

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top