HAMID SULTAN
Datuk Harris Mohd Salleh – Appellant
Versus
Datuk Mohd Shafie Hj Apdal – Respondent
[1] This is my judgment in respect of the plaintiff’s defamation suit against the second to fifth defendants. The action against the first defendant, a well known politician has been settled out of court. And the plaintiff claims against second and fifth defendants: (i) damages of up to RM25,000,000 for libel and slander; (ii) aggravated damages of up to RM10,000,000 for libel and slander; and (iii) exemplary damages of up to RM5,000,000 for libel and slander and against the third and fourth defendants: (i) damages of up to RM1,000,000 for libel and slander; (ii) aggravated damages of up to RM1,000,000 for libel and slander; and (iii) exemplary damages of up to RM1,000,000 for libel and slander.
[2] At the commencement of the hearing, parties have agreed that the case can be heard by way of: (i) witness statement for examination in chief; (ii) preliminary cross-examination witness statement, with full liberty to further cross-examine orally (for purposes of cross-examination); (iii) preliminary re-examination statement with full liberty to further re-examination if there is further oral examination. The court is extremely grateful to the parties for [*377] a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.