SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 MarsdenLR 1900 ; 2004 MarsdenLR 1

ALAUDDIN MOHD SHERIFF, ABDUL AZIZ MOHAMAD, NIK HASHIM
PP – Appellant
Versus
N (A CHILD) – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellant - Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin DPP

JUDGMENT

Abdul Aziz Mohamad JCA:

The question to be decided in the appeal before us, which was the Public Prosecutor's, was whether the detention of a child for purposes of investigations should be under the Child Act 2001 or under s. 117 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC). The Public Prosecutor maintained that it should be under s. 117 of the CPC, which provides as follows in sub-s. (1) and the first sentence of sub-s. (2):

(1) Whenever any person is arrested and detained in custody and it appears that the investigation cannot be completed within the period of twenty-four hours fixed by section 28 and there are grounds for believing that the accusation or information is well founded the police officer making the investigation shall immediately transmit to a Magistrate a copy of the entries in the diary hereinafter prescribed relating to the case and shall at the same time produce the accused before the Magistrate.

(2) The Magistrate before whom an accused person is produced under this section may, whether he has or has not jurisdiction to try the case, from time to time authorize the detention of the accused in such custody as the Magistrate thinks fit for a term not exceeding f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top