HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
HOVID BHD – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A. Background
A(1). Parties And Products
[1] The first plaintiff company (1st plaintiff) is a company incorporated in the United States of America (USA) which has been granted a Malaysian Patent No MY-118194-A (Patent 194) under the Patents Act 1983 ( PA ). Based on Patent 194, the 1st plaintiff produced a pharmaceutical product of alendronic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt (Alendronate) under the trade name "Fosamax" (Fosamax Tablets). Fosamax Tablets are prescribed by doctors to inhibit bone resorption in humans.
[2] The second plaintiff company (2nd plaintiff) is a Malaysian company which holds an exclusive licence from the 1st plaintiff to distribute and sell Fosamax Tablets in Malaysia.
[3] The defendant company (defendant), a Malaysian company, has been granted approval by the National Pharmaceutical Control Bureau to market "Alendronate" 70mg tablets (defendant's Alendronate 70mg Tablets).
A(2). Patent 194
[4] There are 22 "Claims" in Patent 194. Claim 1 is the only "independent" Claim in Patent 194 (Independent Claim 1). Claims 2 to 22 are "dependent" Claims in Patent 194 (Dependent Claims).
[5] I reproduce below Independent Claim 1 as well
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.