SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 MarsdenLR 1031

INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
PIH MARCO SHOE MANUFACTURING SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
BALASINGAM ARUMUGAM – Respondent


AWARD

Background

The parties to this reference are Balasingam Arumugam ("the claimant") and PIH Marco Shoe Manufacturing Sdn Bhd (formerly known as Marco Shoe Sdn Bhd) ("the 1st company"), Perdana Industri Holdings Bhd (Joined as a party by Order of Court on 26 August 1998) ("the 2nd company") and Wah Seong Corporation Bhd (Joined as a party by Order of Court on 10 October 2002) ("the 3rd company"). The dispute concerns the dismissal of the claimant from the services of the 1st company as its adviser. Claimant alleged that his dismissal is without just cause or excuse.

Vide Industrial Court PIH Marco Shoe Manufacturing Sdn Bhd & Anor v. Balasingam Arumugam[2002] 3 MELR 152; [2002] 3 ILR 570 dated 10 October 2002, this division of the Court had, inter alia , ordered that Wah Seong Corporation Bhd (now referred to as "the 3rd company") be joined as a party pursuant to s. 29 (a) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1967 ("the Act").

One BG Lau, group company secretary of the 3rd company appeared in Court for mention on 26 November 2002 pursuant to the Court's issuance of Form L and requested time to engage a solicitor as the 3rd company was objecting to the joinder.

For the purpose of the hear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top