SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 1245

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
MOHD ADNAN ADRIAN PAUL HOLDEN ABDULLAH – Respondent


Table of Content
1. judgment in default against a respondent. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. defense arguments provided. (Para 4)
3. need for affidavit of merits in setting aside judgment. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. respondent's failure to show sufficient evidence. (Para 9)
Abdul Wahab Patail JCA:

The Brief Facts

[1] A judgment in default was recorded against Mohd Adnan Adrian Paul Holden Abdullah, ("the respondent") who was the defendant in the Sessions Court on 10 January 2012. The respondent filed by notice, an application to set aside the said judgment in default on 24 December 2012 citing two reasons:

a. that the summons and statement of claim had never been served to the respondent/defendant; and

b. that the judgment was irregular.

[2] The Sessions Court Judge heard and dismissed the respondent's application. The respondent appealed to the High Court. The appeal was allowed with costs and the judgment in default was set aside.

[3] The appellant, who was the plaintiff in the Sessions Court and respondent in the High Court, appealed to this Court.

The Defences

[4] The respondent's defence on merits provided in the notice were as follows:

1. the respondent had not received the summons and statement of clai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top