COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
DEE BEE YOKE & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
NICK ABU DASUKI HJ ABU HASSAN & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court is asked to exercise its inherent powers. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. challenges to the court's jurisdiction were presented. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. judicial review basis established through prior cases. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. respondents contend jurisdiction limitations for review. (Para 7 , 10 , 13) |
| 5. final decision highlighted a lack of grounds for review. (Para 8 , 11) |
| 6. background details of the applicants' claims are provided. (Para 9) |
[1] In encl 2(a)m the Applicants applied to this Court to exercise its inherent powers and to give the following orders as prayed:
'(i) Bahawa Pemohon-Pemohon/Perayu/Plaintif Ketiga dan Keempat diberi kebenaran untuk memfailkan permohonan ini;
(ii) Bahawa Keputusan Mahkamah Yang Mulia ini yang menolak rayuan Pemohon-Pemohon diketepikan;
(iii) Bahawa keputusan Mahkamah Yang Mulia ini bahawa Pemohon Pertama/Perayu Ketiga tidak mempunyai hak atau 'locus'sebagai isteri undang-undang lazim/isteri berkahwin istiadat untuk membawa tindakan kehilangan tanggungan diketepikan;
(iv) Bahawa keputusan Mahkamah Yang Mulia ini yang memutuskan bahawa definasi 'isteri' di bawah Undang -Undang Sivil 1956 harus dibaca untuk bermaksud seorang isteri yang berkahwin secar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.