COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
HAP SENG CONSOLIDATED BHD – Appellant
Versus
DARINSOK PANGIRAN APAN & ORS AND ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of appeals and party designations (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. native customary rights and land dispute details (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. procedural history of appeals and jurisdiction issues (Para 10) |
[1] There are two appeals before us filed against the decision of the learned High Court Judge sitting at Kota Kinabalu on 21 March 2012 in dismissing the appellants' notice of appeals to the judge in chambers vide encl 87 and 92 against the decision of the Deputy Registrar. The Deputy Registrar had on 16 March 2003, dismissed the appellants' summons in chambers to strike out the respondents' writ of summons and statement of claim ("striking out application").
[2] Before the High Court, the appellants in the two appeals were the 1st defendant, 2nd and 3rd defendants whilst the respondents were the plaintiffs. In this judgment, we will refer to the parties as they were in the High Court.
[3] The two appeals filed by the defendants can be briefly stated as thus:
i. Appeal No S-03(IM)-65-04-2012 was filed by the 1st defendant at the Court below against the decision of the learned High Court judge in dismissing the 1st defendant's appeal against the decision of the lea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.