Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
HAP SENG PLANTATIONS (RIVER ESTATES) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
EXCESS INTERPOINT SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appellant is a company incorporated in malaysia. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. plaintiff filed for fraud and forgery regarding land resolutions. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. discussion of legal jurisdiction and case transfer. (Para 7 , 12 , 21) |
| 4. arguments presented by both plaintiff and defendants on jurisdiction. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. clarification on powers and jurisdiction limits of high courts. (Para 15 , 18 , 23) |
Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin CJM:
Parties
[1] The appellant is a company incorporated in Malaysia under the Companies Act 1965 . It has a registered address at Level 21, Menara Hap Seng, Jalan P Ramlee, 50250 Kuala Lumpur, and a business address at Sungai Segama, Jalan Jeroco, Lahad Datu, 91100 Sabah.
[2] The 1st respondent is a company incorporated in Malaysia under the Companies Act 1965 . It has a registered address at No 37A, Lorong Bunga Matahari 1B, Taman Maju Jaya, 56100 Kuala Lumpur based on the record of the Companies Commission of Malaysia.
[3] The 2nd respondent is an individual whose last known address is at Taman Mawar, Blok 74, Lot 577, PPM 153, Elopura, 90000 Sandakan, Sabah.
[4] The appellant was the plaintiff and the 1st respondent and the 2nd respondent were
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
