HIGH COURT KUALA LUMPUR
AMAZING PLACE SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
COUTURE HOMES SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for interlocutory injunction and striking out claim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background regarding the parties and spa. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. plaintiff's grounds for injunction and defendant's strike-out reasons. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. examination of oral representations and plaintiff's reliance. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. legal standards for contracts and oral representations. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. evidence act provisions on written contracts and extrinsic evidence. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. invalidation of claim based on oral representations. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. discussion on renumbering and designation of parcels. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. clarifications on area ownership and construction rights. (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 10. plaintiff's prayers evaluated against claims. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 11. assessment of adequacy of remedy and damages. (Para 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 12. conclusion on the plaintiff’s claim and motion. (Para 46 , 48) |
| 13. final orders issued by the court. (Para 49) |
[1] Enclosure 3 is the plaintiff's application for an interlocutory injunction to restrain the 1st defendant and its servants or agen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.