ABDUL MALIK ISHAK
YAP EU LEONG SUNNY – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent
Two charges were levied against the appellant, a settlement officer, for corruptly soliciting a bribe under s 3(a)(ii) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1961 (the Act) and for corruptly accepting a bribe under s 4(a) of the Act. After a lengthy trial, the sessions court judge called the defence of the appellant for both charges and, finally acquitted the appellant of the offence under s 3(a)(ii) of the Act but convicted the appellant of the offence under s 4(a) of the Act. The public prosecutor appealed against the order of acquittal, while the appellant appealed against the order of conviction and sentence. For the conviction under s 4(a) of the Act, the sessions court judge sentenced the appellant to one days imprisonment and a fine of RM4,000, in default one years imprisonment. The appellant was also ordered to pay a penalty in the sum of RM500 to the Government of Malaysia within one month from the date of the sentence. By virtue of s 13 of the Act, that penalty shall be recoverable as a fine. The appellant paid both the fine and the penalty.
On 14 December 1993, the public prosecutor withdrew the appeal against acquittal filed by them earlier
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.