SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 MarsdenLR 218

THOMSON, SMITH, ONG
CHEONG SIK KWAN – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
NA Marjoribanks for the appellant.
Harun bin Haji Idris (Federal Counsel) for the respondent.

JUDGMENTBY: THOMSON CJ

delivering the judgment of the Court: This appellant was convicted in the High Court at Ipoh on 28th October, 1958, for four offences of criminal breach of trust in contravention of section 408 of the Penal Code end three offences of falsification of accounts in contravention of section 477A. He was sentenced to terms of imprisonment amounting in all to four years. He has now appealed against his convictions and his sentences.

The only ground of appeal that has been argued before us is that the charges against the appellant were joined and tried together in contravention of the relevant provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and that therefore by reason of the effect attributed to these provisions in the well known case of Subramania Ayyar v King-Emperor 28 IA 257 PC the convictions should be set aside.

On the view we have formed as to the question actually involved in the appeal and before considering the actual charges on which the appellant was tried it is desirable to consider the nature of the prosecution case.

Towards the end of 1957 it was discovered that in the books of the Hongkong and Shanghai Bank at Ipoh there was a very considerable discrep

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top