SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 MarsdenLR 437

LORD DENNING, LORD HODSON, LORD DEVLIN
B SURINDER SINGH KANDA – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERATION OF MALAYA – Respondent


Advocates:
Rodney Bax for the appellant.
Lord Bledisloe QC and Philip Clough for the respondent.

JUDGMENTBY: LORD DENNING

The appellant B. Surinder Singh Kanda was an Inspector of Police in the Royal Federation of Malaya Police. On 7th July, 1958, he was dismissed by the Commissioner of Police on the ground that he had been guilty of an offence against discipline. Inspector Kanda brought an action in the High Court challenging this dismissal. On 24th March, 1960, Rigby J. declared that his dismissal was void and of no effect. The Government appealed. On 14th November, 1960, the Court of Appeal by a majority (Thomson C.J. and Hill J.A., with Neal J. dissenting) allowed the appeal and held that Inspector Kanda was validly dismissed. He now appeals to their Lordships Board.

The appeal raises two questions: (1) The first question is whether the Commissioner of Police had any power to dismiss him. Inspector Kanda says that under the Constitution the power rested only with the Police Service Commission; (2) the second question is whether the proceedings which resulted in his dismissal were conducted in accordance with natural justice. Inspector Kanda says they were not.

The Federation of Malaya came into being on Merdeka Day, that is, 31st August, 1957. Thence forward the Constit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top