SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 MarsdenLR 222

THOMSON, GOOD, NEAL
PONNIAH – Appellant
Versus
CHINNIAH – Respondent


Advocates:
AN Mitra for the appellant.
R Murugason for the respondent.

JUDGMENTBY: THOMSON CJ, GOOD J, NEAL J

THOMSON CJ The respondent to this appeal is the registered proprietor of country land some six acres in extent in the State of Johore and on 6th May, 1958, he applied by way of Originating Summons for certain reliefs in connection with a charge on the land which he had granted in favour of the appellant on 9th January, 1955.

I would observe in limine that the respondent was asking for the discharge of a charge of land which is the equivalent under our land laws of a reconveyance of mortgaged property and it was therefore open to him to proceed by way of Originating Summons under Order LV rule 5A. His solicitor, however, must have been well aware that there was a dispute as to the facts of the case and in the circumstances the proceedings should have been commenced by Writ (see White Book, 1959, p. 1503). In my view this was not in itself fatal to the respondents case but if it has involved any extra costs, as it may have done in the circumstances of the present case, these should be borne by the respondent in any event.

The respondents case was that a few days prior to 9th January, 1955, the appellant agreed to lend him $ 6,750 without inte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top