INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
PUBLIC FINANCE BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMAD BIN MAT ISA – Respondent
AWARD NO. 230 OF 1996 [4 JUNE 1996]
AWARD
The dispute between the claimant and the company is over the dismissal of the claimant by the company by a letter dated 27 January 1994 as its branch manager. The claimant joined the services of the company on 1 January 1982. The hearing of the case has entered its third day. The learned Counsel for the company Mr. Jayasingam in re-examination had asked Sunny Ng Cheong San (COW4) whether the claimant had used the word "commission". COW4's reply was in the affirmative. He, COW4 was asked: "You say you taperecorded this interview - you have the tapes with you?". His reply was in the affirmative. Mr. Jayasingam then asked COW4:
Q: Can you now go and listen to the tape and take down the exact question and answer pertaining to this commission.
COW4's answer: "Yes".
At this stage Mr. Jayasingam proceeded to address the Court.
Mr. Jayasingam: I am asking him to do that now so that he can tell the Court what the exact words used were.
Then Counsel for the claimant made an objection.
Miss Seah: I object because this means he will be allowed to refer to a tape recording the authencity of which I have not yet challenged in cross-examination. If this is coming
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.