SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 MarsdenLR 399

LORD UPJOHN, LORD DEVLIN, LORD WILBERFORCE
SHAABAN – Appellant
Versus
CHONG FOOK KAM – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellants - EFN Gratiaen QC & MP Solomon

JUDGMENT

Lord Devlin (delivering the judgment of the Board):

This is an appeal in an action for false imprisonment. The three defendants in the action, who are the appellants before the Board, are two police officers and the Government of Malaysia. Nothing turns on the separate responsibility of any of the defendants and the action can be described as one brought against the police. The two plaintiffs in the action were arrested on 11 July 1965 for an offence, said to have been committed on the previous day against either s. 304A of the Penal Code or s. 34A of the Road Traffic Ordinance, 1958. The former of these sections corresponds to the offence of manslaughter and the latter makes it an offence to cause death by dangerous or reckless driving. The plaintiffs were held in custody overnight and brought before the Magistrate on 12 July when he made an order for their detention for seven days under s. 117 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 6) for further investigation. On the next day the plaintiffs were released, the police having found that there was not sufficient evidence to proceed against either of them. It was agreed that the false imprisonment, if any, was brought to an en

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top