SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 MarsdenLR 499

SUPREME COURT KUALA LUMPUR
KL ENGINEERING SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
ARAB MALAYSIA FINANCE BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Choong Hor Kiow ,Respondent Advocate: Jennifer Tay

JUDGMENT

Mohamed Dzaiddin Abdullah SCJ:

[1] This is an appeal by KL Engineering Sdn Bhd (the first appellant), a private limited company incorporated in Malaysia under the Companies Act 1965 (the Act), carrying on business at No 47, Jalan SS 20/11, Petaling Jaya, from the decision of the High Court Kuala Lumpur given on 27 February 1990, dismissing an appeal against the decision of the Sessions Court Judge Kuala Lumpur dated 17 May 1989. The appeal was originally brought by the first and second appellant, but at the outset of the hearing of this appeal, Encik Guy Varghese, Counsel for the second appellant, withdrew the latter's appeal. Accordingly, we struck out the second appellant's appeal with costs.

[2] The factual background to the action at the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court was as follows. The respondent, a licensed finance company, sued the first appellant as hirer of one unit of Nikko Concrete Batching Plant (the equipment) under a hire-purchase agreement (P7) purported to have been signed by the second appellant and Kow Yuen Wah on 13 September 1986. Both the second appellant and Kow Yuen Wah had also on the same date executed a letter of guarantee (P13). When the first appella

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top