COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
CHUAH TIM LAN – Appellant
Versus
RHB BANK BHD & ANOR – Respondent
[1] This application was heard by us and at the end of the hearing had unanimously dismissed it with costs. The applicant appellant (hereinafter referred to as the applicant) had sought leave for extension of time, to file the supplementary record of appeal from the date of receipt of the sealed order of the High Court, the notes of evidence and the grounds of judgment of the High Court of Malaya at Alor Star, Kedah Darul Aman.
[2] The antecedents were that the applicant had filed for a judicial review to quash the Industrial Court Award No. 51 of 2006 dated 13 January 2006 but was dismissed with costs (hereinafter referred to as the decision) by the learned judge. The decision date was 30 April 2007. As regards the award, the facts were that the Industrial Court had refused to reinstate a claim which was struck out earlier. The claim was filed by the applicant against the first respondent. Being dissatisfied with the decision she thereafter had filed a notice of appeal to this Court on 21 May 2007.
[3]Vide a letter bearing the date 25 June 2007 the applicant had written to the High Court for the grounds of judgment and the notes of proceedings. On the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.