SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 MarsdenLR 2086

COURT OF APPEAL , PUTRAJAYA
CHANG SHU HUA – Appellant
Versus
GOON FOOK HONG – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Abdul Malik Ishak JCA:

Introduction

[1] On 15 November 2006, another panel of this court heard the parties and gave the decision (referred to as the "court of Appeal judgment of 15 November 2006"). It contained certain orders which have since been perfected (see the order in exh. "GFH1" annexed to the affidavit of Goon Fook Hong - the defendant respondent). In its original text, the court of Appeal judgment of 15 November 2006 was worded as follows:

PERINTAH

RAYUAN ini ditetapkan untuk bicara pada hari ini dalam kehadiran Encik Lum Chee Seng, Peguamcara bagi pihak Perayu, dan Encik Fong Teng Fook, Peguamcara bagi pihak Responden DAN SETELAH MENDENGAR hujah kedua-dua Peguamcara tersebut di atas MAKA ADALAH DIPERINTAH bahawa:

(a) Dengan persetujuan, Perintah Mahkamah Tinggi bertarikh 27 Oktober 2004 diketepikan.

(b) Perkara dalam Saman Pemula bertarikh 8 haribulan Julai 2004 tersebut dikembalikan ke Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur untuk bicara secara keterangan viva voce berkenaan dengan nafkah isteri sahaja.

(c) Responden hendaklah membayar kepada Perayu nafkah isteri interim sebanyak Ringgit Malaysia Enam Ribu (RM6,000.00) sahaja sebulan dari bulan November 2006 sehingga perkara dala

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top