SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 MarsdenLR 3495 ; 2006 MarsdenLR 1

CLEMENT SKINNER
AFFIN BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
WOODHOUSE SDN BHD – Respondent


Advocates:
Bagi Pihak Plaintif - Absent
Bagi Pihak Defendan - Absent

JUDGMENT

This is the hearing of an application by Affin Bank Berhad (formerly known a BSN Commercial Bank (Malaysia) Berhad) (hereafter 'the plaintiff), pursuant to section 148 (2) (c) of the Sarawak land Code ('the Code') for the sale of 50 pieces of land charged to it by Woodhouse Sdn Bhd (hereafter 'the defendant') and described as Lots 7232, 7233, 7234, 7235, 7236, 7237, 7238, 7239, 7240, 7241, 7242, 7243, 7244, 7245, 7246, 7247, 7255, 7256, 7257, 7258, 7259, 7260, 7261, 7262, 7263, 7264, 7265, 7266, 7267, 7268, 7312, 7313, 7314, 7315, 7316, 7317, 7318, 7319, 7320, 7321, 7322, 7323, 7324, 7325, 7326, 7327, 7328, 7329, 7330 and 7331 all of Block 59 Muara Tuang Land District (hereafter referred to as 'the said lands').

The said lands were charged to the plaintiff as security for banking facilities (in the form of an Overdraft and Revolving Credit) granted by the plaintiff to a company called Ekran Berhad (hereafter 'the borrower'). Accordingly, the charge which the defendant executed over the said lands is what is commonly referred to as a third party charge. As the borrower made default in regularising its account with the plaintiff, the plaintiff caused its lawyers to recall th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top