SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 MarsdenLR 378

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
VERA VIANNA KANDASAMY – Appellant
Versus
AIRASIA X BERHAD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Anthony Gomez ,Respondent Advocate: Sebastian Tay Hanxin,Rebecca Sonali Alfred

AWARD

Reihana Abd Razak:

Claimant's Pleaded Case

[1] The Claimant commenced employment with the Company on 29 June 2015 as Financial Reporting Analyst with a monthly basic salary of RM 4500.00. The Claimant was confirmed in her position effective 27 December 2015.

[2] The Claimant contended that the Company's Chief Financial Officer (CFO) one Cheok Huei Shian and the Financial Controller (FC), one Edith Chin assured her that if she could clear the mess and stabilize the Treasury department, she would be promoted as an Assistant Manager.

[3] The Claimant alleged that her performance review for 2015 was carried out by the CFO and FC where she was mostly rated outstanding but in the conclusion they marked down her performance and instead of promoting her as the Assistant Manager for Treasury as promised, they brought one Yap Shwe Pyng who was neither experience in corporate finance or accountancy for the position as well as to be the Claimant's superior.

[4] The Claimant contended that due to the biased performance evaluation, she not only lost the promotion but also her annual increment and bonus, where instead of getting the assured increment of between RM500.00 - RM1000.00, she only rece


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top