SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 547

MAGISTRATE COURT KAJANG
MASEM RESOURCES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
LEE CHIN HOCK (ENCL 8) – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Kuan Voon Shien ,Respondent Advocate: Yau Her Lerk

JUDGMENT

(Enclosure 8)

Muhammad Noor Firdaus Rosli M:

(O 14 r 1 Rules of 2012)

[1] Enclosure 8 is the plaintiff's application for a summary judgment.

Facts Of The Case

[2] Lee Chin Hock, the defendant ("the defendant") and Masem Resources Sdn Bhd the plaintiff ("the plaintiff"), via two agreements entered into on 3 December 2019, had agreed that the defendant appointed the plaintiff to supply materials and carry out works in relation to two projects: one at Salak Interchange (Southbound) ("1st Project") and the other at Duke Phase 3 s 4 - Setiawangsa to Melati ("2nd Project").

[3] These works emanated from the fact that the defendant was appointed as a contractor by DBM Engineering Sdn Bhd ("DBM") pursuant to an agreement ("Main Contract") for the two aforesaid projects.

[4] The plaintiff averred that it had fulfilled all of its contractual duties and issued three bills of quantities dated 27 December 2019, 30 December 2019 and 24 January 2020 to the defendant, demanding payment of RM47,589.52.

[5] On 15 June 2020, the defendant paid RM5000, leaving a balance of RM42,859.52.

[6] The plaintiff had sent continuous demands to the defendant seeking the payment for the balance sum.

[7] The plaint


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top