COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SAUL HAMID PAKIR MOHAMAD – Appellant
Versus
INSPEKTOR ABDUL FATAH ABDUL RAHMAN & ANOR – Respondent
[1] As orally affirmed to us by the appellant's counsel, the appellant's action in the High Court was an action for the tort of false imprisonment.
[2] The appellant was arrested on 21 March 1987 as a result of the making of the two police reports that are set out in the judgment of my learned brother, Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin JCA. 21 March 1987 was a Saturday and the time of the arrest was 3.15pm 22 March 1987 was a Sunday, which the learned trial judge said was an excluded day. The appellant was produced before a magistrate at 10.30am on Monday 23 March 1987 and was ordered to be remanded for two days under s 117 of the Criminal Procedure Code . On 25 March 1987 the Sessions Court President (qua magistrate) extended the remand to 29 March 1987 and on that day the appellant was released on police bail.
[3] In his written Outline of Submissions in the appeal the appellant's counsel raised three issues concerning the arrest of the appellant. For the first issue, he submitted at p. 3 that "the 1st respondent had no power at that time to arrest the appellant for an offence under s 323 of the Penal Code , which is a non-seizable offence". I shall
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.