VERONICA RAJANDRA vs OROAPAC MALAYSIA SDN BHD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 2062

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
VERONICA RAJANDRA – Appellant
Versus
OROAPAC MALAYSIA SDN BHD – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Nirumala Pusudoray,Aziah Ahmad Dahalan ,Respondent Advocate: Aiu, Der Lin,Caroline Goh Seow Siang

Table of Content
1. reference and cause papers considered. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. claimant's employment details and terms. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. claimant's onboarding and support issues. (Para 14 , 18 , 19)
4. court's role in termination assessments. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
5. burden of proof in dismissal cases. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
6. probationary employment principles. (Para 30 , 32)
7. company's justification for non-confirmation. (Para 35 , 37 , 39 , 40)
8. assessment criteria for performance. (Para 46 , 48 , 50)
9. performance improvement plan discussions. (Para 58 , 62)
10. termination meeting and performance evaluation. (Para 66 , 70)
11. final decision and dismissal of the case. (Para 88)

[1] This is a reference dated 17 March 2021 made by the Honourable Minister of under s 20(3) of the IRA 1967 ("the Act") arising out of the dismissal of VERONICA A/P RAJANDRA (hereinafter referred to as "the Claimant") by OROAPAC MALAYSIA SDN BHD (hereinafter referred to as "the Company") on 12 May 2020.

Cause Papers, Witness Statements And Documents

[2] In the course of arriving at the decision in this full award, this court had considered the following cause papers and documents filed by the parties in this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 2062

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPURVERONICA RAJANDRA – AppellantVersusOROAPAC MALAYSIA SDN BHD – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
VERONICA RAJANDRA – Appellant
Versus
OROAPAC MALAYSIA SDN BHD – Respondent