Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA, IPOH
PP – Appellant
Versus
SHAH RIZAN AYOOB HUSSAIN & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the drug transaction and arrest. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. defense challenges sufficiency of the prosecution's case. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 3. criteria for establishing a prima facie case. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. referencing standards for witness evidence and efforts to produce them. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. evaluation of evidence against the standard for reasonable doubt. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
[1] Both the accused persons were charged as follows:
Bahawa kamu pada 22 Jun jam lebih kurang 12.30 pagi, dalam mencapai niat bersama kamu, di tempat letak motokar Hotel Royal Casuarina, Jalan Gopeng Ipoh, di dalam Daerah Kinta, di dalam Negeri Perak, telah mengedar dadah berbahaya iaitu cannabis seberat 9743 gram dan oleh yang demikian, kamu telah melakukan suatu kesalahan di bawah seksyen 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 yang boleh dihukum di bawah seksyen 39B(2) Akta yang sama dibaca bersama seksyen 34 Kanun Keseksaan .
The Prosecution Case
[2] On 21 June 2003, DSP Ravichandran a/l Ramachandran (SP7) has arranged for a sale transaction of 10 kilograms of cannabis betwe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
