SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 MarsdenLR 1670

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
GUAN AIK MOH (KL) SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
SELANGOR PROPERTIES BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:LC Loh ,Respondent Advocate: Cheah Tien Eu

JUDGMENT

Gopal Sri Ram JCA:

[1] This appeal is directed against the order of the High Court entering Judgment for the plaintiff (Respondent before us) against the defendants (Appellants before us) and in dismissing the 1st defendant's counterclaim. The factual background against which this appeal rests is as follows.

[2] Primakar Sdn Bhd ("Primakar") is an importer and dealer of motor cars. The 1st defendant which is a private limited Company placed an order for a BMW motor car for importation into this country. The order form was signed on the 1st defendant's behalf by its Managing Director the 2nd defendant. The 1st defendant then obtained finance from the plaintiff for the purchase of the car the plaintiff purchased the car from Primakar and let it to the 1st defendant pursuant to a hire-purchase agreement entered into between them. The 2nd defendant guaranteed repayment. Later, the car was seized by officers of the Royal Customs for default in the payment of the actual duty payable on the car The 1st defendant then defaulted in paying the instalments due under the hire- purchase agreement. The plaintiff brought an action against the defendants to recover the sums due under the hi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top