HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
CHERY AUTOMOBILE RUS – Appellant
Versus
AH SHIN SHIPPING SA & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal of defendants' application (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background facts regarding cargo and vessel (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. investigation and access issues in vietnam (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. discharge requests and legal actions in kuantan (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. court proceedings and consent orders (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 6. defendants' arguments against ex parte orders (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 7. court's analysis of disclosure and access (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68) |
| 8. evaluation of materiality and urgency (Para 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83) |
| 9. final judgment rationale and dismissal of application (Para 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90) |
| 10. conclusion on costs and application dismissal (Para 91) |
Introduction
[1] This my judgment dismissing the Defendants' Application in encl 19 to set aside the ex parte orders made on 2 May 2023.
[2] The main issue for determination is whether the Plaintiff had failed to make
Pentamaster Instrumentation Sdn Bhd v. QAV Technologies Sdn Bhd & Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.