SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 1349

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA – Respondent
[Suit No: WA-27NCC-46-12/2018]



Petitioner Advocates:Leong Wai Hong,Brenda Chan ,Respondent Advocate: Anisah Normah Muhamad Nor

A collateral contract existed obligating the Defendant to waive liquidated damages in exchange for the Plaintiff's continued funding, leading to a finding of unjust enrichment.

Headnote:(A) Contract Law - Collateral Contract - Unjust Enrichment - The Plaintiff's claim for RM20,208,151.67 and RM15,389,726.41 was allowed due to the Defendant's breach of a collateral contract regarding funding for vessel construction. The Defendant, having induced the Plaintiff to continue funding based on representations, was found to be unjustly enriched by retaining the benefit of the vessels without fulfilling its obligations. (Paras 22, 23, 99, 117)

(B) The court established that a collateral contract existed between the parties, obligating the Defendant to waive liquidated damages for the Plaintiff's continued funding. (Paras 67, 76)

(C) The court invoked the doctrine of estoppel, preventing the Defendant from denying its earlier representations that induced the Plaintiff's actions. (Paras 80, 81)

(D) The Defendant's termination of the Shipbuilding Contract was deemed unjust and made in bad faith, as it had previously assured the Plaintiff of continued support for the project. (Paras 78, 84) (E) The Defendant was ordered to pay costs of RM50,000.00 to the Plaintiff.

Table of Content
1. plaintiff's claim for funding post-receivership. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
2. plaintiff's arguments on collateral contract and unjust enrichment. (Para 13)
3. defendant's arguments denying liability. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. court's analysis on the existence of a collateral contract and unjust enrichment. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115)
Khadijah Idris J:

Introduction

[1] The Plaintiff's claim against the Defendant was for the sum RM20,208,151.67 and RM15,389,726.41 being post-receivership funding extended for the construction of two vessels for the Defendant.

[2] Full trial was conducted where the Plaintiff called 3 witnesses and Defendant called 2 witnesses. At the end the trial, having considered the evidence as a whole, the Plaintiff's claim was allowed. The grounds are stated below.

Factual Background

[3] Between 2004 and 2012 Plaintiff, a licensed bank, granted banking facilities to one NGV Tech Sdn Bhd ("NGV Tech") a ship builder to the extent of RM884,330,000.00 ("Banking Facilities") and various documents were executed ("Facility Documents"). In consideration thereof, NGV Tech executes various Debentures in favour of the Plaintiff ("Debentures").

[4] On 21 February 2012 the Defendant, through the Ministry of Defence ("MINDEF"), and NGV Tech entered into a contract i.e. Shipbuilding Contract No KP/PERO2B/RT305/2010/DE for the sale and fitting out of two (2) training vessels known as Gagah Samudera and Teguh Samudera ("Vessels") for the Royal Malaysian Navy ("Shipbuilding Contract") for a total sum RM294,000,000.00. Under the Shipbuilding Contract (see Common Bundle of Document ("CBoD") Volume B7 pp 2572 - 2676) MINDEF is the implementing agency on behalf of the Defendant.

[5] NGV Tech defaults in repaying the banking facilities owing to the Plaintiff. On 20 March 2013, the Plaintiff issued a notice of crystallisation whereby all floating charges over NGV Tech's assets were crystallised into a fixed charge.

[6] On 3 April 2013 the Plaintiff appoints Mr Duar Tuan Kiat as Receiver and Manager ("the R & M") over NGV Tech. On 9 April 2013, the R & M together with, among others, representatives from NGV Tech and the Plaintiff met with the Secretary General of MINDEF to inform the appointment of the R & M.

[7] On 14 May 2013, NGV Tech was wound up pursuant to a winding-up petition presented by Nordic International Ltd

[8] Via its letter dated 4 July 2013, the R & M notified the Defendant inter alia that NGV Tech has been wound up and the R & M has been appointed to take over NGV Tech.

[9] Pursuant to the terms of the Facility Documents, the Plaintiff was entitled to terminate the Banking Facilities. However, by way of a collateral contract between the parties, the Plaintiff agreed to continue funding the construction of the Vessels pursuant to the Defendant's representations, inter alia:

(a) the sale and delivery of the Vessels was a project of national interest;

(b) that all liquidated damages would be waived entirely and unconditionally subject to only the approval of the Ministry of Finance ("MOF"). Written confirmation of the unconditional waiver of all liquidated damages ("Written Confirmation") would be given and forthcoming. Defendant through MINDEF would secure the Written Confirmation; and

(c) the Defendant would not seek to set off the balance progress payment (approximately RM40 million for work done by NGV Tech) payable to NGV Tech against any liquidated damages (approximately RM40 million too) which the Defendant is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top