SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 426

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
CHONG JEE FATT – Appellant
Versus
TEE & C (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Chong Jee Fatt ,Respondent Advocate: Jean Tan Hui Jia

Table of Content
1. dismissal and claimant's representation (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. court's authority to proceed with case (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. winding up and leave requirement (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. determining date of dismissal (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
5. corporate structure and evidence requirement (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
6. fairness of termination (Para 40 , 41 , 42)

[1] This is a reference dated 17 March 2021 made by the Minister of Human Resources pursuant to subsection 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 [Act 177] arising out of the dismissal of Chong Jee Fat ("the Claimant") by Tee E & C (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd ("the Company") on 30 June 2020.

Brief Facts

[2] The claimant was appointed as Assistant Manager, Infrastructure of Tee M & E Engineering Sdn Bhd on 4 January 2016. The claimant stated that the company later changed its name to Tee E & C (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd ("the company") and it was not objected to by the company's representative. The claimant was then asked to voluntarily resign on 30 April 2020 but the claimant refused. The company then terminated the claimant's employ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top