SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 MarsdenLR 320

DIPLOCK, CROSS OF CHELSEA, KILBRANDON, SALMON
TRACTORS MALAYSIA BHD – Appellant
Versus
TIO CHEE HING – Respondent


Advocates:
Samuel Stamler QC and Nicholas Strauss for the appellant.
JG Le Quesne QC and Stuart McKinnon for the respondent.

Lord Diplock

(delivering the judgment of the Board): This is an appeal from an interlocutory order of the Federal Court of Malaysia. The question that it raises is whether an action (herein called "the New Action") brought by the respondent against the appellant in the High Court in Borneo by a Writ and Statement of Claim dated May 16, 1972 ought to be summarily dismissed as frivolous and vexatious. The principal relief sought in the New Action was to set aside a judgment entered against the respondent on December 27, 1969 in a previous action (herein called "the Old Action") between the same parties for the sum of $718,266.85, due under an agreement of November 21, 1968. The appellant's application to set aside the Writ and all subsequent proceedings in the New Action was based on the inherent jurisdiction of the court to prevent abuse of its process. Affidavit evidence was adduced by each party. Upon consideration of this evidence the High Court (Lee Hun Hoe J.) was satisfied that the New Action was frivolous and vexatious and brought "to defeat the course of justice in the hope of delaying the execution of a judgment", sc. in the Old Action. He, accordingly, set aside the procee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top