COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
QUAH SWEE KHOON – Appellant
Versus
SIME DARBY BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parameters of certiorari jurisdiction (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. findings on constructive dismissal (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. judicial review limitations (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. concept of constructive dismissal (Para 22 , 23 , 25) |
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal brought against the decision of the learned judge in the High Court at Kuala Lumpur whereby he quashed an award of the Industrial Court that had been handed down in the appellant's favour At the heart of this appeal lies the vexed question whether the High Court acted within the parameters of its certiorari jurisdiction. The essence of the dispute would appear to centre on a complaint by the appellant that the learned judge had indeed exercised appellate jurisdiction in proceedings that were plainly not an appeal. The factual matrix that forms the background to this appeal may be shortly stated.
Background Facts
[2] At all material times the appellant was the controller-processing of the respondent company. According to the evidence that he gave before the Industrial Court, he was in charge of all palm oil mills operated by the respondent. On 6 August 1993, the respondent sent a memorandum to the appellant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.