SEAH, SYEDIL BARAKBAH, WAN HAMZAH
NKM HOLDINGS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PAN MALAYSIA WOOD BHD – Respondent
(delivering the Judgment of the Court): We dismissed the appeal as we were satisfied that the learned judge had properly exercised his discretion in dispensing with the advertisements either in the Gazette or in the newspapers of a new date for the hearing of a winding-up petition on the facts of this particular case. We would be content to rest the matter there had it not been for the fact that the learned judge spoke of the Gazette in language that might be wrongly interpreted. The learned judge said (at [1985] 2 MLJ 390, 391):
"I agree with Mr. Davidson that the need to gazette has indeed deteriorated into a mere formality and in the face of the existence of widely circulated daily newspapers has perhaps become an anachronism."
With respect to the learned judge, we are unable to agree with his view. Advertisement of a winding-up petition in the Gazette is a statutory requirement [see Rule 24(a) of the Companies (Winding-up) Rules 1972] and deliberate noncompliance with this provision may result in adverse consequences. It must always be borne in mind that we are Judges, not legislators. The constitutional function of the courts is not only to interpret but also to enfor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.