SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 1871

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ABAD ARENA JUARA SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH JAIKISHAN – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Dato' RS Sodhi ,Respondent Advocate: Ramasamy Amaippan

Table of Content
1. the appellant seeks to set aside prior court orders. (Para 1)

[1] The appellant/defendant appeals against the decision of learned High Court Judge who refused to set aside the order for vacant possession and double rental against the plaintiff ordered by the Sessions Court pursuant to the Originating Summons (OS).

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top