SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 2198

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
SUMON KHAN & ANOR – Respondent
[Crime Appeal: Q-05(LB)-182-05/2017]



Petitioner Advocates:Tengku Intan Suraya Tengku Ismail ,Respondent Advocate: Augustine Liom

Without evidence of unlawful entry, no prima facie case of migration smuggling can be established.

Headnote:This case involves an appeal by the prosecution against the acquittal of Sumon Khan and Mohammed Yazir bin Openg under the Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007. The court found no evidence of unlawful entry or exit, stating prima facie case was not established per sections 26A and 26G of the Act. The primary issues were whether there was common intention and proper evidence under the law. The court confirmed the prosecution’s failure to prove its case.

Table of Content
1. charges must have evidence of unlawful action. (Para 1)

[1] This appeal is by the prosecution against the order of acquittal and discharge of 2 Accused persons, Sumon Khan and Mohammed Yazir bin Openg, at the end of the prosecution's case.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top