Back
Next 
2018 MarsdenLR 1567
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
SUMON KHAN & ANOR – Respondent
[Crime Appeal: Q-05(LB)-182-05/2017]
Petitioner Advocates:Tengku Intan Suraya Tengku Ismail ,Respondent Advocate: Augustine Liom
Without evidence of unlawful entry, no prima facie case of migration smuggling can be established.
Headnote:This case involves an appeal by the prosecution against the acquittal of Sumon Khan and Mohammed Yazir bin Openg under the Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007. The court found no evidence of unlawful entry or exit, stating prima facie case was not established per sections 26A and 26G of the Act. The primary issues were whether there was common intention and proper evidence under the law. The court confirmed the prosecution’s failure to prove its case.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. charges must have evidence of unlawful action. (Para 1) |
[1] This appeal is by the prosecution against the order of acquittal and discharge of 2 Accused persons, Sumon Khan and Mohammed Yazir bin Openg, at the end of the prosecution's case.
