SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 410

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
MOHD SHAHRIL HUSSIN – Appellant
Versus
MAASDOTS SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Ahmad Fakhri Abu Samah,Muhammad Faizal ,Respondent Advocate: Leong Jin Hoong,Lee Ghi Yann

AWARD

Andersen Ong Wai Leong:

A. Reference

[1] This is a reference from the Director General for Industrial Relations to the Industrial Court of Malaysia under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ("the IRA 1967") as amended by the Industrial Relations (Amendment) Act 2020 (A 1615), in respect of the dismissal of Mohd Shahril Bin Hussin ("the Claimant") by his employer, Maasdots Sdn Bhd ("the Company") on 31 October 2022.

B. Case Summary And Proceedings

[2] The dispute in our present case is over the termination of the Claimant's employment, purportedly pursuant to a Mutual Separation Agreement.

[3] The main issue for the Court 's determination is whether the parties entered into a valid and binding Mutual Separation Agreement that lawfully and effectively terminated the Claimant's employment with the Company by mutual consent.

[4] The Claimant denied entering into any Mutual Separation Agreement and asserted that the Company's unilateral imposition of his departure on 31 October 2022, purportedly based on an alleged Mutual Separation Agreement to which he had never agreed, amounted to constructive dismissal.

[5] As with all other constructive dismissal cases, where the fact


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top