SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 2696

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
MUHAMMAD FAIZ FAZIL MAHMUD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. facts surrounding the drug charge and sentencing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments on sentencing adequacy and public interest. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
3. court's reasoning on sentencing trends and public interest. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. final decision and order regarding the appeal. (Para 17)
Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim JCA:

The Charge

"Bahawa kamu bersama-sama pada 19 Mei 2013, jam lebih kurang 12.01 tengah malam, di hadapan Mc Donalds, Jalan SS 21/39, Up Town 5, Damansara Utama, di dalam Daerah Petaling Jaya, di dalam Negeri Selangor, telah mengedar dadah berbahaya iaitu 871 gram Cannabis, dan dengan itu kamu telah melakukan suatu kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 39B(2) Akta yang sama dibaca bersama s 34 Kanun Keseksaan."

Brief Facts Of The Case

[1] On 5 September 2013, acting upon the information on drug trafficking activity, ASP Mohd Sahar bin Mohd Yunus ("the complainant") and his team went to Jalan SS 21/39 Up Town 5, Damansara Utama, Petaling Jaya.

[2] After making observation, the complainant saw a man who was later identified as Muhammad Faiz bin Fazil Mahmud ("the 2nd accused") was sitting with a wo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top