SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 MarsdenLR 933

FEDERAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
HOH KIANG NGAN – Appellant
Versus
MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN MALAYSIA & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Vincent Chandran ,Respondent Advocate: N Sivabalah

JUDGMENT

Gopal Sri Ram JCA:

[1] This appeal concerns a short but important point of principle. It has to do with the meaning of the term 'workman' appearing in s 2 of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ('the Act') and whether the instant appellant comes within the statutory definition. Initially, after the delivery by the parties of the statement of case and statement in reply, the respondent invited the Industrial Court to adjudicate upon this question as a preliminary issue. That Tribunal having declined the invitation, the respondent moved the High Court which quashed the refusal and issued mandamus compelling the Industrial Court to hear and determine the point as a preliminary issue before proceeding to hear the case on its merits. In compliance with that order the Industrial Court proceeded to determine the question. It took evidence and heard argument on the issue. Later, it made an award in the appellant's favour. It ruled that he was a workman within the Act.

1

[2] The respondent then moved the High Court a second time. It sought an order of prohibition restraining further conduct of the appellant's case before the Industrial Court on the ground that the appellant was not a wor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top