HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
GARY TEH CHIN YEONG – Appellant
Versus
KWONG YAN LOY & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal applicability of objection to 'without prejudice' negotiations. (Para 1 , 10) |
| 2. establishment of waiver principles related to negotiations. (Para 2 , 15) |
| 3. overview of the defendants' application regarding without prejudice negotiations. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. interpretation of section 23 and its implications for evidence. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. explanation of waiver and admissibility of without prejudice negotiations by the defendants. (Para 14) |
| 6. criteria for granting stays pending appeals. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. outcome of the decision on the stay application. (Para 20) |
[1] This is an application in court encl no 7 (encl 7) by the defendants (defendants) in this originating summons (OS) to expunge certain paragraphs and exhibits in an affidavit filed by the plaintiff (plaintiff) in support of the OS.
[2] Enclosure 7 is premised on the ground that the plaintiff has wrongly referred in his affidavit to "without prejudice" negotiations between the parties to settle this dispute amicably (Without Prejudice Negotiations) which is privileged and inadmissible as evidence. The sole issue that arises is whether the defendants have waived their right to object to the admissib
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.