FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
PCP CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
LEAP MODULATION SDN BHD; ASIAN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (INTERVE.... – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. public confidence in judiciary is vital. (Para 1 , 39 , 41) |
| 2. attorney-general's application centers on arun kasi's alleged contempt. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. statements in question imply misconduct by judges. (Para 29 , 30 , 36) |
| 4. contempt requires an objective assessment of the statements. (Para 54 , 56 , 86) |
| 5. imposing a sentence reflects the seriousness of the offence. (Para 119) |
| 6. arun kasi's actions warrant committal for contempt. (Para 120) |
[1] This is our judgment in respect of the Honourable Attorney-General's application dated 28 February 2019, seeking an order of committal against Arunachalam Kasi ('Arun Kasi') for contempt of court, more particularly, scandalising contempt.
[2] The grounds upon which this application was made was that Arun Kasi had scandalised the Federal court of Malaysia by making various allegations regarding judicial conduct in the hearing, disposal and adjudication of a civil application before the Federal court on 7 November 2018 in two articles published online by a news portal known as Aliran.
[3] The thrust of the Attorney-General's originating summons is that Arun Kasi's statements in these two articles insinuate that the Federal court J
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.