MAJLIS ANGKATAN TENTERA MALAYSIA vs MOHD NURUL AMI MOHD BASRI

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 MarsdenLR 2140

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
MAJLIS ANGKATAN TENTERA MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
MOHD NURUL AMI MOHD BASRI – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Kogilambigai Muthusamy ,Respondent Advocate: Manjit Singh Man

Table of Content
1. validity of procedural adherence in urine testing. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. challenge of army guideline's validity against kkm. (Para 5)
3. applicability and interpretation of the army and kkm guidelines. (Para 8 , 11 , 18 , 20)
4. disputation over number of urine samples for testing. (Para 12)
5. timing of declaratory relief applications related to ongoing judicial processes. (Para 19 , 36)
6. examined precedent establishing kkm guideline's standing. (Para 21)
7. the kkm guideline lacks legal enforcement. (Para 24 , 31 , 34)
8. kc guideline's lack of statutory force discussed. (Para 30)

[1] This appeal was against the decision of the High Court at Ipoh allowing the respondent's application by way of Originating Summons for the following declaratory orders:

(a) The "Perintah Majlis Angkatan Tentera 4/2009" ("the Army Guideline") dated 14 May 2009 which lays down the procedure for testing drug abuse in urine is null and void as it does not conform to the "Surat Pekeliling Ketua Pengarah Kesihatan Malaysia, Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia" dated 3 September 2002 and Garis Panduan Bahagian Kesihatan Perkembangan Perubatan Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia Bilangan 6/2002" ("the KKM G

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 MarsdenLR 2140

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYAMAJLIS ANGKATAN TENTERA MALAYSIA – AppellantVersusMOHD NURUL AMI MOHD BASRI – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
MAJLIS ANGKATAN TENTERA MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
MOHD NURUL AMI MOHD BASRI – Respondent