SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 MarsdenLR 537

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
MAJLIS PEGUAM MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNASAMY BHAKTAVATSALU – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Farez Jinnah ,Respondent Advocate: M Manoharan

JUDGMENT

Lee Swee Seng JCA:

[1] Trust once broken is difficult to be restored. It is expected of and exacted from all professionals but no profession is more exposed to the temptations of a breach of trust than the legal profession, for in its members is reposed not just confidences but cash.

[2] Whilst competence in the law can be acquired through study and practice, moral fibre and character are assumed to be possessed by a lawyer until it is found wanting. Doubtless by that time the client would have suffered. Understandably the Bar Council is concerned that its members who have breached the trust reposed in them especially, when it comes to client's money, must be severely dealt with by no less than a disbarment from practice.

Introduction

[3] The respondent in this case, who was the applicant before the High Court, was once a member of the Malaysian Bar. He was struck off the Roll of advocates and solicitors of the High Court of Malaya in 2005. After some lapse of 25 years since the respondent was suspended in 1989 and about 12 years after he was struck off the Roll, he applied to be restored to the Roll of the honourable profession again.

In The High Court

[4] Before the High Court


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top