SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 MarsdenLR 2020

HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
SECURITIES COMMISSION – Appellant
Versus
LEE KEE SIEN ALBERT & ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Nallini Pathmanathan JC:

Enclosure 3

[1] Enclosure 3 is the plaintiff's inter partes application under s. 100 of the Securities Industry Act 1983 and/or O. 29 of the Rules of the High 1980 and/or the inherent jurisdiction of the Court for a Mareva injunction against the third defendant, Amir bin Hassan ('Amir') to prevent him from, inter alia ,:

(a) removing from Malaysia assets in Malaysia albeit in his name or otherwise and whether solely or jointly owned up to a value of US$83 million;

(b) disposing or dealing with his assets whether in or outside Malaysia, whether in his own name or not up to a value of US$83 million, or otherwise diminishing their value;

(c) A series of other reliefs designed to make Amir provide full disclosure of any and or all monies that have been forwarded by investors to accounts set up by him or jointly with any of the other defendants.

Outline Facts

[2] The salient facts relating to this matter are comprehensively set out in the submissions filed by the plaintiff at paras 2(i)-(vi) of the plaintiff's written submissions. I do not intend to reproduce those facts here. In brief, the plaintiff contends that the 3rd defendant is involved in an investm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top