SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 MarsdenLR 621

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
EU BOON YEAP & ORS – Appellant
Versus
EWE KEAN HOE – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mokhtar Sidin JCA:

[1] Briefly, the appeal before us concerns the decision of the High Court in allowing the respondent's claim to probate in respect of the alleged will of Eu Chin Eow, deceased, dated 26 November 1990 and in refusing the appellants' counterclaim that the alleged will is invalid and that the deceased died intestate. The said Eu Chin Eow (the deceased) died on 10 December 1995 aged 80 years old, survived by his eldest son Eu Boon Yeap the 1st appellant, his daughter Eu Siew Cheng the 2nd appellant and his wife Ong Sin Kheng, the 3rd appellant. At the time of the deceased's purported execution of the alleged will dated 26 November 1990, the deceased was 75 years old.

[2] The respondent in the present appeal, the plaintiff in the Court below, filed a writ of summons dated 11 September 1996 against the 1st appellant. He is the nephew of the deceased and the statement of claim reads:

1. Plaintif ialah wasi yang dilantik di dalam wasiat terakhir Eu Chin Eow, simati beralamat di No. 3 Jalan Padang Tembak, Pulau Pinang yang meninggal dunia pada l0hb Disember 1995, wasiat tersebut adalah bertarikh 26hb November 1990.

2. Plaintif manafikan kepentingan Defendan yang dinya

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top