Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
GULA PERAK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
DATUK LIM SUE BENG & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of appeals and initial court decisions (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. introduction of the appeals. (Para 2) |
| 3. factual background of gula perak. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. common legal questions raised. (Para 15) |
| 5. central legal questions regarding conditional agreements (Para 16 , 17 , 22) |
| 6. interpretation of s 214a(1) of the nlc. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. court's findings on the legality of the compromise. (Para 26) |
| 8. outcome of appellate rulings and implications for agreements (Para 76) |
[1] These are six appeals heard together before us. The appeals are as follows:
(i) two appeals vide Civil Appeal No: 02(f)-45-06-2017(B) and Civil Appeal No: 02 (f)-46-05-2017(B) where the appellant in both appeals is Gula Perak Berhad (Gula Perak); and the respondents respectively are Datuk Lim Sue Bing (Datuk Lim) and Yakin Tenggara Sdn Bhd (Yakin Tenggara) - (Gula Perak Appeals);
(ii) two appeals vide Civil Appeal No: 02(f)-59-06-2017 (B) and Civil Appeal No: 02(f)-60-06-2017(B) where the appellant in both appeals is Ambank (M) Berhad and the respondents are Datuk Lim, Gula Perak, Yakin Tenggara, Faithmont Estate Sdn Bhd (Faithmont) and RHB Bank Berhad (RHB) - (Ambank
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
