SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 834

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
GAN BOON AUN – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin CJM:

Background Facts

[1] The appellant together with another accused person, Khiudin Mohd were charged before the Sessions Court in Kuala Lumpur and the charges are as follows:

Principal Charge

"That you between 28 February 2006 to 15 February 2007, at Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad, Exchange Square, Bukit Kewangan, 50200 Kuala Lumpur, in the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, abetted Transmile Group Berhad (Company No 373741-W) in making a statement that is misleading in a material particular in Transmile Group Berhad's 'Quarterly Report On Unaudited Consolidated Results For The Financial Year Ended 31 December 2006' and the misleading statement is underlined in red in the Appendix to this charge, and the said statement is likely to induce the purchase of securities of Transmile Group Berhad by other persons, and when the statement is misleading in a material particular, and you have thereby committed an offence under s 86(b) read together with s 122C(c) of the Securities Industry Act 1983 (Act 280) and punishable under s 88B of the same Act."

Alternative Charge

"That Transmile Group Berhad (Company No 373741-W) between 14 February 2007 and 15 Febru

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top