SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 MarsdenLR 588

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MARZAINI ZAINUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
MAJLIS PEGUAM MALAYSIA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Victoria Martin ,Respondent Advocate: Sheila Lingam

JUDGMENT

Abdul Malik Ishak J:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal in encl (1) filed by the appellant against the Disciplinary Board's ("DB's") decision to suspend the appellant from practice pursuant to s 94(4)(c) of the Legal Profession Act 1976 ("the Act") pending a full inquiry into the complaint. The DB's order dated 22 April 2006 is found at p 86 of the appeal record. The application under s 94(4)(c) of the Act was made by the Bar Council by way of a letter dated 24 February 2006 as seen at pp 1 to 3 of the appeal record. That s 94(4)(c) of the Act reads as follows:

94 Power of Disciplinary Board to strike off the Roll, suspend for misconduct, etc

(4) Where an advocate and solicitor:

(c) is the subject of a complaint concerning any dishonest act committed by him in his capacity as an advocate and solicitor;

and the Bar Council considers that it would be in the public interest or in the interest of his clients or of the profession that such advocate and solicitor be suspended from practice, the Bar Council may apply to the Disciplinary Board for an order suspending such advocate and solicitor from practice until further notice.

The Bar Council's application is based on a complaint lodge

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top