SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 1975

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
OH LEONG THYE – Appellant
Versus
WONG YOKE KUEN & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Tee Kuo Ying ,Respondent Advocate: Dhyana Shila

Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JCA:

[1] The appellant/petitioner in this appeal, appeals against the decision of the learned Judicial Commissioner limited to three grounds as per the submission. The three grounds are as follows:

(i) Division of Matrimonial Assets;

(ii) Access Right to the Child; and

(iii) Adultery Claim Against the 2nd respondent.

[2] The orders made by the High Court inter alia read as follows:

"(a) Hak kawalan, penjagaan dan pemeliharan Leo Oh Qin Yau (No Surat Beranak: CA 73965) diberikan kepada responden pertama dengan akses munasabah kepada Pempetisyen untuk melawat anak tersebut di tempat awam dan akses tersebut akan dan perlu di bawah pengawasan responden pertama;

(b) Hartanah A iaitu sebuah rumah dua tingkat yang mempunyai alamat No 2, Jalan Setia Perdana U13/25C, Ayur Prima, Setia Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan tersebut dijual pada harga pasaran dan hasil jualan Hartanah A dibahagikan antara responden pertama dan Pempetisyen dalam nisbah 80% kepada responden pertama dan 20% kepada Pempetisyen masing- masing;

(c) Pempetisyen memindahmilik setengah (1/2) bahagian Hartanah B iaitu sebuah rumah "semi-detached" yang mempunyai alamat di No 8, Jalan Menteri Ul/85, Temasya Glenmarie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top