SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 MarsdenLR 334

RAJA AZLAN SHAH
RAMIAH – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellant - Dominic Puthucheary; Skrine & Co. For the respondent - Tengku Suleiman ibni Sultan Ismail

JUDGMENT

Raja Azlan Shah J:

(delivering oral judgment): The appellant was driving a Sri Jaya bus on the main Kuala Lumpur/Ipoh Road. He intended to turn right into Jalan Perhentian. But he did not stop at the junction. The said bus collided into a scooter coming from the opposite direction. The pillion rider died as a result of the collision. On those simple facts the learned President found the appellant guilty under s. 34A(1) of the Road Traffic Ordinance, 1958 and sentenced him to one day's imprisonment and fined him $2,000 in default six months' imprisonment. He was further disqualified from driving all classes of vehicles for a period of five years. He appealed against conviction and sentence.

It is not the law under s. 34A of the Road Traffic Ordinance that merely because an accident had happened and a person had been killed, danger had in that sense arisen and therefore it must follow, as the night, the day, that the appellant was driving in a manner dangerous to the public. In a case under s. 34A, two things must be established. First, there must be a situation created by the accused which, viewed objectively, is dangerous. Dangerous driving is not defined in the Road Traf

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top