COURT OF APPEAL KOTA KINABALU
LIAW HEN KYUN & ORS – Appellant
Versus
HO MUI FEN & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the facts leading to the dispute. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 14 , 16) |
| 2. core legal reasoning regarding the fraud and limitation defense. (Para 18 , 28 , 38 , 41 , 42 , 58) |
| 3. court's observations regarding the factual and procedural implications. (Para 19 , 24 , 25 , 29 , 30 , 34 , 36 , 46) |
| 4. arguments regarding limitation period and locus standi. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 49 , 50) |
Mohd Zawawi Salleh JCA:
Introduction
[1] For convenience, in this judgment, we will refer to the parties in the manner they were referred to in the High Court.
[2] There are two interrelated appeals before us, arising from the common judgment of the High Court at Kota Kinabalu, which allowed the plaintiff's claim for:
(i) rescission of the settlement agreements dated 22 December 2006, 14 February 2007 and 4 June 2007;
(ii) transfer of lands held under CL015489040, TL010509065, CL015375505 and CL017544857 to the plaintiff at the defendants' costs and expense;
(iii) repayment of the debt due from the 4th defendant to the plaintiff in the sum of RM52 million less any sums already paid or set off; and
(iv) damages in the sum of RM7,215,231.80.
Background
[3] These cases have had
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.