SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 336

COURT OF APPEAL KOTA KINABALU
LIAW HEN KYUN & ORS – Appellant
Versus
HO MUI FEN & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent


Table of Content
1. summary of the facts leading to the dispute. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 14 , 16)
2. core legal reasoning regarding the fraud and limitation defense. (Para 18 , 28 , 38 , 41 , 42 , 58)
3. court's observations regarding the factual and procedural implications. (Para 19 , 24 , 25 , 29 , 30 , 34 , 36 , 46)
4. arguments regarding limitation period and locus standi. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 49 , 50)
JUDGMENT

Mohd Zawawi Salleh JCA:

Introduction

[1] For convenience, in this judgment, we will refer to the parties in the manner they were referred to in the High Court.

[2] There are two interrelated appeals before us, arising from the common judgment of the High Court at Kota Kinabalu, which allowed the plaintiff's claim for:

(i) rescission of the settlement agreements dated 22 December 2006, 14 February 2007 and 4 June 2007;

(ii) transfer of lands held under CL015489040, TL010509065, CL015375505 and CL017544857 to the plaintiff at the defendants' costs and expense;

(iii) repayment of the debt due from the 4th defendant to the plaintiff in the sum of RM52 million less any sums already paid or set off; and

(iv) damages in the sum of RM7,215,231.80.

Background

[3] These cases have had

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top